Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
owen at delong.com
Wed Apr 21 22:31:09 CDT 2010
On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Roger Marquis wrote:
> William Herrin wrote:
>>> Not to take issue with either statement in particular, but I think there
>>> needs to be some consideration of what "fail" means.
>> Fail means that an inexperienced admin drops a router in place of the
>> firewall to work around a priority problem while the senior engineer
>> is on vacation. With NAT protecting unroutable addresses, that failure
>> mode fails closed.
> In addition to fail-closed NAT also means:
> * search engines and and connectivity providers cannot (easily)
> differentiate and/or monitor your internal hosts, and
> * multiple routes do not have to be announced or otherwise accommodated
> by internal re-addressing.
I fail to see how NAT even affects this in a properly structured network.
More information about the NANOG