Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Apr 19 20:16:40 CDT 2010


 now now... you know better than that.  of course they have IPv6... they
 just don't connect to -your- IPv6 cloud... :)

--bill


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:01:10PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:42:06 EDT, Joe Provo said:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:58:43PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > be attractive to at least some of them.  Come up with some kind of
> > > logo for the program "IPv6 READY!".   Make it a bandwagon thing so
> > > that vendors who aren't part of the program look behind the times.
> > 
> > Wheels, they get re-invented: http://www.ipv6ready.org/
> 
> How sad. I have IPv6, they don't (at the moment anyhow)...
> 
> % wget http://www.ipv6ready.org
> --2010-04-19 20:53:53--  http://www.ipv6ready.org/
> Resolving www.ipv6ready.org... 2001:468:603:c001::5, 132.177.125.100
> Connecting to www.ipv6ready.org|2001:468:603:c001::5|:80... failed: Connection timed out.
> Connecting to www.ipv6ready.org|132.177.125.100|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 6381 (6.2K) [text/html]
> Saving to: b 
index.htmlb 

> 
> 100%[======================================>] 6,381       --.-K/s   in 0.05s   
> 
> 2010-04-19 20:54:14 (122 KB/s) - b 
index.htmlb 
 saved [6381/6381]
> 
> % traceroute6 2001:468:603:c001::5
> traceroute to 2001:468:603:c001::5 (2001:468:603:c001::5), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
>  1  fe80::260:3eff:fe8c:bc99%ppp0 (fe80::260:3eff:fe8c:bc99%ppp0)  56.953 ms  65.618 ms  65.497 ms
>  2  isb-7301-1.gi0-1.110.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:210a::1)  64.179 ms  65.069 ms  65.086 ms
>  3  isb-6509-2.gi4-15.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:f220::1)  196.036 ms  198.903 ms  198.779 ms
>  4  isb-7606-1.ge1-1.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:f221::2)  64.558 ms  64.438 ms  64.315 ms
>  5  2001:468:cfe:1002::1 (2001:468:cfe:1002::1)  70.066 ms  69.948 ms  69.706 ms
>  6  2001:468:c00:ffff::1 (2001:468:c00:ffff::1)  69.574 ms  65.763 ms  55.573 ms
>  7  2001:468:c00:ffee::2 (2001:468:c00:ffee::2)  71.210 ms  71.056 ms  70.934 ms
>  8  2001:468:ff:906::1 (2001:468:ff:906::1)  75.973 ms  75.855 ms  75.677 ms
>  9  2001:468:ff:646::1 (2001:468:ff:646::1)  86.494 ms  86.363 ms  86.199 ms
> 10  * * *
> 11  * * *
> 12  * * *
> 13  * * *
> 14  * * *
> 15  * * *
> 16  * * *
> 17  * * *
> 18  * * *
> 19  * * *
> 20  * * *
> 21  * * *
> 22  * * *
> 23  * * *
> 24  * * *
> 25  * * *
> 26  * * *
> 27  * * *
> 28  * * *
> 29  * * *
> 30  * * *
> 






More information about the NANOG mailing list