Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Apr 20 01:16:40 UTC 2010
now now... you know better than that. of course they have IPv6... they
just don't connect to -your- IPv6 cloud... :)
--bill
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:01:10PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:42:06 EDT, Joe Provo said:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:58:43PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > be attractive to at least some of them. Come up with some kind of
> > > logo for the program "IPv6 READY!". Make it a bandwagon thing so
> > > that vendors who aren't part of the program look behind the times.
> >
> > Wheels, they get re-invented: http://www.ipv6ready.org/
>
> How sad. I have IPv6, they don't (at the moment anyhow)...
>
> % wget http://www.ipv6ready.org
> --2010-04-19 20:53:53-- http://www.ipv6ready.org/
> Resolving www.ipv6ready.org... 2001:468:603:c001::5, 132.177.125.100
> Connecting to www.ipv6ready.org|2001:468:603:c001::5|:80... failed: Connection timed out.
> Connecting to www.ipv6ready.org|132.177.125.100|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 6381 (6.2K) [text/html]
> Saving to: b
index.htmlb
>
> 100%[======================================>] 6,381 --.-K/s in 0.05s
>
> 2010-04-19 20:54:14 (122 KB/s) - b
index.htmlb
saved [6381/6381]
>
> % traceroute6 2001:468:603:c001::5
> traceroute to 2001:468:603:c001::5 (2001:468:603:c001::5), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
> 1 fe80::260:3eff:fe8c:bc99%ppp0 (fe80::260:3eff:fe8c:bc99%ppp0) 56.953 ms 65.618 ms 65.497 ms
> 2 isb-7301-1.gi0-1.110.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:210a::1) 64.179 ms 65.069 ms 65.086 ms
> 3 isb-6509-2.gi4-15.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:f220::1) 196.036 ms 198.903 ms 198.779 ms
> 4 isb-7606-1.ge1-1.cns.ipv6.vt.edu (2001:468:c80:f221::2) 64.558 ms 64.438 ms 64.315 ms
> 5 2001:468:cfe:1002::1 (2001:468:cfe:1002::1) 70.066 ms 69.948 ms 69.706 ms
> 6 2001:468:c00:ffff::1 (2001:468:c00:ffff::1) 69.574 ms 65.763 ms 55.573 ms
> 7 2001:468:c00:ffee::2 (2001:468:c00:ffee::2) 71.210 ms 71.056 ms 70.934 ms
> 8 2001:468:ff:906::1 (2001:468:ff:906::1) 75.973 ms 75.855 ms 75.677 ms
> 9 2001:468:ff:646::1 (2001:468:ff:646::1) 86.494 ms 86.363 ms 86.199 ms
> 10 * * *
> 11 * * *
> 12 * * *
> 13 * * *
> 14 * * *
> 15 * * *
> 16 * * *
> 17 * * *
> 18 * * *
> 19 * * *
> 20 * * *
> 21 * * *
> 22 * * *
> 23 * * *
> 24 * * *
> 25 * * *
> 26 * * *
> 27 * * *
> 28 * * *
> 29 * * *
> 30 * * *
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list