Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
jgreco at ns.sol.net
Mon Apr 19 19:08:05 CDT 2010
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> >> On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>> I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think
> >>> there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s.
> >> to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large
> >> ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so.
> >> Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell.
> > Which hurts more ... NATting eyeballs, or blinding them entirely?
> > Eventually we'll run out. Then we get to pick.
> IPv6 is not blinding them entirely.
No, IPv6 is clear vision. My _point_ was that NAT'ing eyeballs was
better than providing no IPv4 gameplan (i.e. blind).
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
More information about the NANOG