FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling favoring, Comcast

Paul WALL pauldotwall at gmail.com
Mon Apr 12 06:11:38 UTC 2010


On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Richard Bennett <richard at bennett.com> wrote:
> The FCC is structured in such a way that the chairman calls all the shots on
> policy matters. In this instance, the former chairman, Kevin Martin, was
> responsible for the Comcast order but the current chairman, Julius
> Genachowski, had to defend it in court. Some wags insist that the defense
> was a bit lackluster because Genachowski didn't much care for the legal
> basis of the Comcast order, which relied on a lot of smoke and mirrors to
> regulate aspects of edge network behavior that Congress never told the FCC
> to regulate. The defense relied on some legal theories that weren't used in
> the order itself, and that's a no-no in an appeal. The court took the rather
> extraordinary step of suggesting arguments that the FCC could have used in
> the appeal that it didn't use.
...
> Research Fellow
> Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

It should probably be noted, for purpose of establishing bias, that
Richard is a Washington lobbyist, hired to represent Comcast on
regulatory matters.  What he views as overstepping legal bounds,
others may view as protecting consumers...

Drive Slow,
Paul Wall




More information about the NANOG mailing list