ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
owen at delong.com
Fri Apr 9 11:30:08 CDT 2010
> Put differently, you work in this arena too... you've presumably
> talked to stakeholders. Can you list some of the reasons people have
> provided for not adopting v6, and are any of them related to the v6
> policies regarding address space?
People simply fear deploying new technology to their environment.
The future is uncertain. Many people fail to realize that IPv4's future
is even more uncertain than that of IPv6.
You are not the only one expressing doubt in IPv6. The reality,
however, is that I think that LSN and a multi-layer NAT internet
are even more worthy of doubt than IPv6.
Many people are approaching this like driving at night with the
headlights off. They refuse to alter course until they can see
the wall. There is a wall coming in two years whether you can
see it or not. If you have not begun to deploy IPv6 (changed
course), then there will soon come a point where the accident
has already occurred, even though you cannot yet see the
wall and have not yet made physical contact with it.
A classic example of this phenomenon would be a certain
large unsinkable ship where the captain chose to try and
make better time to New York rather than use a lower speed
to have time to avoid ice bergs. The ship never arrived in
New York and its name became an adjective to describe
More information about the NANOG