zaid at zaidali.com
Sun Apr 4 16:50:22 CDT 2010
On 4/4/10 2:04 PM, "Vadim Antonov" <avg at kotovnik.com> wrote:
>> P.s. Disclaimer: I have always been a network operator and never a dentist.
> I would have thought opposite.
It is sometimes helpful to draw lessons from nature and other systems :)
> People who have been on this list longer would probably remember when I
> was playing in this sandbox.
> The real wisdom about networks is "never try to change everything and
> everywhere at once". You either do gradual migration, or you end up in a
> big pile of poo. Which what IPv6 transition situation is.
I too apply the same "real wisdom" and view IPv6 transition as a gradual
migration and we are seeing a lot of success already with this approach, its
just that the adoption numbers are slower than we would like. I get a sense
that our 5+ year IPv6 discussions have people worried and panicked that the
best thing is to leave things as they are <insert NAT solutions> which makes
me think we should perhaps spend less time on the advocacy part of IPv6
solution and put our efforts on what we get out of implementation.
More information about the NANOG