ISP port blocking practice/Free Speech

Sun Oct 25 19:45:01 UTC 2009

>Your scholar is wrong -- or he is giving the simplified explanation
>for children and others incapable of rational though and
>understanding, and you are believing the summary because it is
>simpler for you than understanding the underlying rational.

Ah, the classic nerd legal misconception.  Laws are not software,
because they are interpreted by politicians and judges, not CPU chips.
Dartmouth has a fine tradition of legal scholarship dating back at
least to Daniel Webster, and he knows what he is talking about.  There
is plenty of documention of the way that judges around the country
interpret the First Amendment, and if you look, you will find that his
description is the way they interpret it.

You are of course welcome to interpret the law any way you want, but
don't expect to impress any courts with your theories.  

ObOperations: Since ISPs are not government actors, the First
Amendment doesn't apply unless we get intrusive Net Neut laws.

R's,
John

PS: I used to be the mayor of my small municipality, and we learned
quite a lot about the First Amendment as applied when we tried to
revise our sign ordinance.