109/8 - not a BOGON

Shane Short shane at short.id.au
Fri Oct 9 06:35:55 CDT 2009


Hi Matthew,

I had the same problem with our new range assigned to us by APNIC, out  
of 110/8

You're in for a long, hard and frustrating road.

If you manage to get in contact with anyone, or anyone responds to  
you, mind letting me know? I'd suspect they'd probably have us blocked  
still too, we've just not come across it yet.

Regards,
Shane Short


On 09/10/2009, at 7:22 PM, Matthew Walster wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of  
> addresses
> he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
> declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
>
> If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you  
> review
> it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8  
> and 83/8
> work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
>
> Matthew Walster





More information about the NANOG mailing list