Minimum IPv6 size
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Sat Oct 3 10:01:42 UTC 2009
On Oct 3, 2009, at 1:28 AM, "James Aldridge" <jhma at mcvax.org> wrote:
[...]
> It might be worth relaxing filtering within 2001::/16. The RIPE NCC
> appears to be making /48 PI assignments from within 2001:678::/29
> (e.g. the
> RIPE Meeting next week will be using 2001:67c:64::/48)
Why the whole /16 rather than just that /29 and a few other blocks set
aside for /48s? There are a lot of /48s in a /16, so protecting
against someone accidentally deaggregating their allocated /32 into /
48s seems legitimate.
Regards,
Leo
More information about the NANOG
mailing list