AH is pretty useless and perhaps should be deprecated
bit.gossip at chello.nl
Sat Nov 14 01:37:26 CST 2009
Junos VRRP with md5 authentication does.....
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 07:57 +0530, Jack Kohn wrote:
> So who uses AH and why?
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> > I've never seen anyone use AH vs. ESP. I've always used ESP and so has
> > every other IPSEC implementation I've seen anyone do.
> > Owen
> > On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Jack Kohn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Interesting discussion on the utility of Authentication Header (AH) in
> >> IPSecME WG.
> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg05026.html
> >> Post explaining that AH even though protecting the source and
> >> destination IP addresses is really not good enough.
> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg05056.html
> >> What do folks feel? Do they see themselves using AH in the future?
> >> IMO, ESP and WESP are good enough and we dont need to support AH any
> >> more ..
> >> Jack
More information about the NANOG