you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

• Previous message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Next message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On May 14, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Mans Nilsson wrote:

> Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the  
> wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:58:32AM +1000 Quoting  
> Mark Andrews (Mark_Andrews at isc.org):
>> 	And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?
>
> Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and
> the firewalls are again useless.
>
This is, indeed, already happening.  In fact, I'm running an SMTP server
with TLS on port 80 to get around SPRINT's existing braindamage.

(or at least the braindamage they had at one point).

Owen

> -- 
> Måns Nilsson		
>
>

• Previous message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Next message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]