you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

• Previous message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Next message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Subject: Re: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden] Date: Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:26AM +0100 Quoting John R. Levine (johnl at iecc.com):
>>> 	And what's the next protocol that is going to be stomped on?
>>
>> Anything except http; at which point everything will move to http, and
>> the firewalls are again useless.
>
> Um, if you think that http on consumer networks is transparent, I have  
> some really bad news for you.

If you change my sentence thusly: 

s/http/ what can be communicated over http/1;s/http/said channel/2; 

..it all makes sense again, even "better" than before.  

-- 
Måns Nilsson		

• Previous message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Next message (by thread): you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]