Packet Loss to Google, others
Tomas L. Byrnes
tomb at byrneit.net
Thu May 14 16:24:32 UTC 2009
All well from Cox in San Diego:
PING googlemail.l.google.com (74.125.19.18) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=0 ttl=246
time=32.9 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246
time=33.7 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=2 ttl=246
time=35.7 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=3 ttl=246
time=36.0 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=4 ttl=246
time=34.8 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=5 ttl=246
time=31.7 ms
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Ringsmuth [mailto:andyring at inebraska.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:02 AM
>To: Peter Beckman
>Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Packet Loss to Google, others
>
>Yeah, definitely seeing it here. Gmail via POP has been dead for a
>while too. This is via Unite Private Networks (via Qwest ultimately)
>in Lincoln, Neb.
>
>Last login: Thu May 14 10:35:12 on ttys000
>204-Andy:~ andyring$ ping google.com
>PING google.com (74.125.45.100): 56 data bytes
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=233 time=323.535 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=233 time=339.249 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=5 ttl=233 time=334.392 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=6 ttl=233 time=320.491 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=7 ttl=233 time=321.207 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=10 ttl=233 time=320.925 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=12 ttl=233 time=330.371 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=16 ttl=233 time=321.174 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=21 ttl=233 time=336.478 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=24 ttl=233 time=326.038 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=26 ttl=233 time=323.370 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=27 ttl=233 time=330.263 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=29 ttl=233 time=327.915 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=30 ttl=233 time=333.887 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=32 ttl=233 time=334.694 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=33 ttl=233 time=330.924 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=34 ttl=233 time=330.133 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=35 ttl=233 time=333.507 ms
>^C
>--- google.com ping statistics ---
>37 packets transmitted, 18 packets received, 51% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 320.491/328.808/339.249/5.800 ms
>204-Andy:~ andyring$
>204-Andy:~ andyring$
>
>
>
>On May 14, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
>
>> Anyone else getting reports of Google (and other destinations)
>> slowness?
>>
>>> From Verizon FIOS Northern VA:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best
>> Wrst StDev
>> 1. xxx2 0.0% 20 0.6 0.6 0.4
>> 0.7 0.1
>> 2. 10.1.41.89 0.0% 20 1.6 1.8 1.6
>> 3.0 0.3
>> 3. G2-0-3-891.WASHDC-LCR-08.ver 0.0% 20 1.6 1.7 1.6
>> 2.0 0.1
>> 4. so-1-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR2.veriz 0.0% 20 2.2 2.7 2.1
>> 7.5 1.4
>> 5. 0.ge-5-2-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NE 0.0% 20 2.9 2.9 2.7
>> 3.1 0.1
>> 6. 204.255.168.30 0.0% 20 6.2 9.4 6.1
>> 70.6 14.4
>> 7. cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net 0.0% 20 6.5 6.8 6.3
>> 7.3 0.3
>> 8. 12.122.134.157 0.0% 20 6.2 27.8 6.1
>> 196.8 51.4
>> 9. ??? 100.0 20 0.0 0.0 0.0
>> 0.0 0.0
>> 10. 216.239.48.108 55.0% 20 328.2 335.7 326.8
>> 389.6 20.3
>> 11. 64.233.175.109 50.0% 20 334.7 333.0 325.1
>> 337.4 4.0
>> 12. 72.14.236.74 30.0% 20 328.3 328.3 324.3
>> 335.5 3.5
>> 13. he-in-f147.google.com 40.0% 20 335.2 328.6 323.6
>> 337.0 4.5
>>
>>> From Cox Fiber in Northern VA / DC:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best
>> Wrst StDev
>> 1. 70.164.19.3 0.0% 20 0.2 0.2 0.2
>> 0.4 0.1
>> 2. wsip-70-168-111-17.dc.dc.cox 0.0% 20 1.7 9.6 1.5
>> 77.5 20.9
>> 3. mrfddsrj01-ge706.rd.dc.cox.n 0.0% 20 13.2 3.9 1.4
>> 18.7 5.2
>> 4. ashbbbrj01-ae0.0.r2.as.cox.n 0.0% 20 2.5 2.7 2.3
>> 6.4 0.9
>> 5. 209.85.240.136 0.0% 20 39.5 10.5 3.7
>> 63.0 15.3
>> 6. 64.233.175.111 0.0% 20 4.9 4.7 4.1
>> 5.9 0.4
>> 7. 72.14.236.74 0.0% 20 6.0 6.9 6.0
>> 8.5 0.7
>> 8. he-in-f147.google.com 0.0% 20 4.4 4.6 4.1
>> 7.1 0.8
>>
>>> From Level3 in New York:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best
>> Wrst StDev
>> 1. 208.72.185.177 0.0% 20 0.4 89.0 0.3
>> 303.9 86.1
>> 2. 208.72.184.245 0.0% 20 0.4 0.8 0.3
>> 7.7 1.6
>> 3. ge-6-7.car3.NewYork1.Level3. 0.0% 20 0.5 2.3 0.5
>> 29.9 6.6
>> 4. vlan69.csw1.NewYork1.Level3. 0.0% 20 4.5 6.1 0.6
>> 14.0 4.7
>> 5. ae-61-61.ebr1.NewYork1.Level 0.0% 20 1.6 1.0 0.7
>> 1.6 0.2
>> 6. ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Leve 0.0% 20 11.3 10.9 5.4
>> 19.1 4.3
>> 7. ae-64-64.csw1.Washington1.Le 0.0% 20 14.0 10.9 5.8
>> 18.5 4.8
>> 8. ae-1-69.edge1.Washington1.Le 0.0% 20 6.2 9.2 5.8
>> 60.1 12.0
>> 9. ??? 100.0 20 0.0 0.0 0.0
>> 0.0 0.0
>> 10. 209.85.241.50 50.0% 20 330.9 330.3 329.1
>> 331.6 0.9
>> 11. 64.233.175.219 55.0% 20 316.6 314.4 311.7
>> 317.3 2.3
>> 12. 72.14.236.66 60.0% 20 317.4 319.6 314.1
>> 328.0 4.5
>> 13. he-in-f147.google.com 45.0% 20 323.9 321.5 312.1
>> 332.9 6.9
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>> Peter Beckman
>> Internet Guy
>> beckman at angryox.com
>http://www.angryox.com/
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list