AS path weirdness
James Aldridge
jhma at mcvax.org
Sun Mar 22 12:09:34 UTC 2009
Jason Lewis wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure what I'm looking at. The reserved AS, 65490
> appears in parentheses and I've never seen that in MRT formatted data
> and not sure why it's happening.
That would be a single-element AS_SET, I guess.
> I'm also not clear on why I see 23456 *and* a 32 bit AS in the path. Is
> anyone else seeing this or is it something wacky at RRC04?
That's certainly not limited to rrc04. From one of our routers at the AMS-IX
I see the following (JunOS 9.2, so 32-bit AS numbers are in "ASPLAIN" format
and AS_TRANS is spelt out):
A Destination P Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hop AS path
* 91.201.176.0/22 B 170 100 0 >195.69.144.110 3356 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 10 >193.0.0.147 12859 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 50 >195.69.144.200 12859 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.35 12859 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.178 6320 3327 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.47 8218 3257 3356 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.50 1103 3549 3327 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.34 1103 3257 3356 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.144 1273 3549 3327 21219 196638 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.89 286 3549 3549 3327 21219 196638 I
* 91.207.218.0/23 B 170 100 0 >195.69.144.110 3356 13249 6886 196629 I
B 170 100 0 >193.0.0.147 3356 13249 6886 196629 I
B 170 100 50 >195.69.144.200 12859 35320 196629 AS_TRANS ?
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.35 12859 35320 196629 AS_TRANS ?
B 170 100 >195.69.144.178 6320 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS ?
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.144 1273 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS ?
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.89 286 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS ?
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.47 8218 3257 3356 13249 6886 196629 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.50 1103 3549 3356 13249 6886 196629 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.34 1103 3257 3356 13249 6886 196629 I
* 195.88.52.0/23 B 170 100 0 >195.69.144.110 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 0 >193.0.0.147 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 50 >195.69.144.200 12859 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.35 12859 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.144 1273 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.89 286 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.47 8218 3257 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.50 1103 3549 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.34 1103 3257 3356 13249 28761 196665 I
* 195.128.231.0/24 B 170 100 0 >195.69.144.110 3356 13249 6886 196629 35748 I
B 170 100 10 >193.0.0.147 12859 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 50 >195.69.144.200 12859 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.35 12859 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.178 6320 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.144 1273 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 100 >195.69.144.89 286 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 0 >195.69.145.47 8218 3257 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.50 1103 3257 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
B 170 100 >195.69.144.34 1103 3257 2914 35320 196629 AS_TRANS 35748 I
AS_TRANS and a 32-bit ASN only seem to appear together in the paths through
35320 so it looks as though something odd is going on there.
James
More information about the NANOG
mailing list