DPI or Flow Management
Lorell Hathcock
lorell at hathcock.org
Sun Mar 1 16:32:42 UTC 2009
Francois:
Should your email have also included a French interpretation as well?
Sincerely,
Lorell Hathcock
-----------------------------------------------------
Francois :
Votre email devrait-il avoir également inclus une interprétation française
aussi bien ?
Sincèrement,
Lorell Hathcock
-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Menard [mailto:francois at menards.ca]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:51 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: DPI or Flow Management
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial
contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5%
effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by
ISPs, such as Flow Management
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip
This is part of the public record at the following address:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htm
The world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the
legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an
incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface.
NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain
silent on this.
Best regards,
F.
--
François D. Ménard
francois at menards.ca
More information about the NANOG
mailing list