Anyone notice strange announcements for 220.127.116.11/24
ren.provo at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 17:04:50 CST 2009
Fair enough. Unfortunate, and I'll miss you in .DR, but understood.
Now that doesn't mean other operators can't put in a lightning talk about
the impact or 'event' this triggered in their own NOC environments along
with what they recommend operators do to reduce the spun cycles <G>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> Could you please put in a lightning talk for this experiment? It would
>> be great to hear more about this in .DR. We're accepting submissions now
>> for lightning talks on Monday the 26th of January.
> a - i will not be in dr. i really wanted to support the dr meeting,
> but it's hard to justify after four years of service. maybe i'll
> make the next one.
> b - we can not present results before papers are submitted.
> c - we hope to present results at ops fora, nanog included, if they
> are good enough to warrant as opposed to just good sensationalist
> blah blah.
More information about the NANOG