bicknell at ufp.org
Thu Feb 19 09:19:19 CST 2009
In a message written on Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:01:59AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Would it be insane to have an IETF back-to-back with a NANOG?
Probably, but it would be a good idea. :)
I have no idea how the IETF agenda is set, but that may be part of
the trick. I suspect network operators care a lot about protocols
at lower layers in the stack, and less and less at higher levels
in the stack.
SeND, DHCP, the RA stuff are all very important to us; some new
header field in HTTP or IMAP much less so. Since IETF is usually
5 days, it would be nice if that lower level stuff could be adjacent
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NANOG