IPv6 Confusion
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Wed Feb 18 20:42:05 UTC 2009
> > 2) Some end-node box with a IPv6 stack from "Joe's Software Emporium
> > and
> > Bait-n-Tackle" sees an RA packet, and concludes that since RA and
> > DHCPv6
> > are mutually exclusive, to ignore any DHCPv6 packets it sees, and
> > hilarity
> > ensues.
>
>
> They are not mutually exclusive, DHCPv6 *requires* RA.
In your previous Nanog message you said:
> DHCPv6 can operate without RA now.
Please make up your mind.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the NANOG
mailing list