IPv6 Confusion

Wed Feb 18 02:23:37 UTC 2009

> I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated

the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on
track.  of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.

> with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining
> these with NAT-PT could help with the transition

cgn is not a transition tool.  it is a dangerous hack to deal with
the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
space to number their customer edge.

randy