One /22 Two ISP no BGP

Michael Smith msmith at internap.com
Fri Feb 13 15:24:20 CST 2009


That was my implication...


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pstewart at nexicomgroup.net]
>Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:50 PM
>To: Michael Smith; Charles Regan; nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
>
>Telebec's only upstream is Bell Canada (AS577) hence why you see
>that...;)
>
>Paul
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Smith [mailto:msmith at internap.com]
>Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:34 PM
>To: Charles Regan; nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
>
>I see multiple paths to that block all converge at bell.ca.
>
>I don't see a route with 35911 (telebec) in the AS_PATH, unless it is
>start-of-string and followed by _577_ (bell.ca).
>
>They seem to be consistent...
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Charles Regan [mailto:charles.regan at gmail.com]
>>Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:23 PM
>>To: nanog at nanog.org
>>Subject: Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
>>
>>Just got final confirmation from ISP1 that they will not do BGP with
>us.
>>
>>ISP1 is Telebec.
>>http://www.iptools.com/dnstools.php?tool=ipwhois&user_data=142.217.0.0
&
>s
>>ubmit=Go
>>
>>My subnet
>>http://www.iptools.com/dnstools.php?tool=ipwhois&user_data=204.144.60.
0
>&
>>submit=Go
>>
>>What can we do now ? Any suggestions ?
>>
>>Charles
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>----
>
>"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
>to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged
>material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender
>immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all
>attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank
>you."




More information about the NANOG mailing list