Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
nanog at daork.net
Mon Feb 2 20:01:50 CST 2009
On 3/02/2009, at 12:17 PM, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
> Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren at free.fr>:
>>> Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses
>>> RFC1918 gives you.
>> Use IPv6.
> For an IPv4 scalability test? Interesting idea...
> Apart from the basic incompability here, my opinion of IPv6 is that it
> just gives you 2^96 more addresses to repeat all the old mistakes
2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336
2^128-2^32 = 340282366920938463463374607427473244160
More information about the NANOG