Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Michael Hallgren
m.hallgren at free.fr
Mon Feb 2 21:14:38 UTC 2009
Le lundi 02 février 2009 à 19:22 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a écrit :
> "Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
>
> > What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> > closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
> > sometimes....
>
> Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> RFC1918 gives you.
Use IPv6.
Cheers,
mh
> In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly.
>
> Been there.
>
> Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
>
> > Paul
>
> --Johnny
>
--
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090202/fc80cbb9/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list