Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Johnny Eriksson
bygg at cafax.se
Mon Feb 2 19:22:39 UTC 2009
"Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
> What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
> sometimes....
Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
RFC1918 gives you. In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly.
Been there.
Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
> Paul
--Johnny
More information about the NANOG
mailing list