sink.arpa question
Ted Hardie
hardie at oakthorn.com
Thu Dec 17 23:16:12 UTC 2009
Silly question: how well would using 1.0.0.257.in-addr.arpa match the
need identified in draft-jabley-sink-arpa ?
It seems like it would be equally well guaranteed to be non-existant
(short of change in the def of IPv4 and in-addr.arpa). Like
sink.arpa, it would get you a valid SOA and nothing else.
Am I missing something, or is this operationally equivalent?
regards,
Ted
More information about the NANOG
mailing list