Arrogant RBL list maintainers

Wed Dec 16 05:30:55 UTC 2009

On 09/12/2009 15:18, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
>> a84-22-xx-xx.cb3rob.net. as it's RFC complient and we cannot be fucked to
>>      
haha. and what precisely did you expect? that's not really what most 
people would consider valid reverse dns for a mail relay. (operational 
practice often beats RFC where they exist, and more often than not fills 
in where they don't).

personally, i'd recommend not being a dick and setting valid 
*meaningful* reverse dns for things relaying mail.

(i also notice that in later replies you claim that they're breaking eu 
data laws, but you seem to have bleeted on enough about how you think 
data is something that should be in the public domain, so you can 
download movies, err i mean, be like totally free man.)

adama.