Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
sethm at rollernet.us
Fri Dec 11 20:48:35 CST 2009
William Pitcock wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
>>> ASPEWS is listing 220.127.116.11/20 as being associated with the whole
>>> Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 18.104.22.168/20 being
>>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
>> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
>> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
>> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
> Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always
under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are
moved to the back of the line" with SORBS.
More information about the NANOG