Arrogant RBL list maintainers
Ken Chase
ken at heavycomputing.ca
Wed Dec 9 20:09:20 UTC 2009
To be clear: because the legitimate mailserver with a proper non-generic
reverse was in a block with other generic reverses, they blacklisted you?
That's egregiously harsh.
SORBS was blocking a customer for a generic reverse entry, I gave them a legit
looking reverse (that fwds properly too), solved, if a bit irritating. To
require the whole BLOCK be totally legit is too much.
/kc
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:48:28PM -0500, Michael Holstein's said:
>No, we do have it correct .. they wanted us to fix all the *other* ones
>(that can't even send mail because they're firewalled from doing so) ..
>
>$ dig -t mx csuohio.edu
>[..]
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>csuohio.edu. 10800 IN MX 10 antispam5.csuohio.edu.
>csuohio.edu. 10800 IN MX 10 antispam4.csuohio.edu.
>csuohio.edu. 10800 IN MX 10 antispam3.csuohio.edu.
>csuohio.edu. 10800 IN MX 10 antispam2.csuohio.edu.
>Michael Holstein
>Cleveland State University
>
--
Ken Chase - ken at heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list