Fiber cut in SF area

chris.ranch at chris.ranch at
Mon Apr 13 14:16:43 CDT 2009

Peter Beckman [mailto:beckman at] wrote:
>Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:19 AM
>To: Dylan Ebner
>Cc: nanog at
>Subject: RE: Fiber cut in SF area
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Dylan Ebner wrote:
>> It will be easier to get more divergence than secure all the 
>> manholes in the country.
>I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access 
>points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a 
>better solution.  

The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis.  Cost of each, plus operational costs, * however many of each type.  How much would that be?

Then amortize that out to our bills.  Extra credit: would you pay for it?


More information about the NANOG mailing list