Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?

Alexander Harrowell a.harrowell at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 11:21:28 CDT 2009


On Thursday 09 April 2009 16:48:32 Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:
> Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch)
> networks have Gi segment (interface between GGSN & IP Router/firewall). Due
> to the IP address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi firewall to
> NAT the private IP to public IP in the past. Looking at the traffic pattern
> and user access behaviour, does it make sense to have firewall between the
> GGSN & Public Internet if the public IP addresses are sufficient to cater
> for mobile subscribers? Especially with 3G/UMTS/HSPA or even LTE in the
> future.
>
> Please share your thought and thanks in advance :)
>
> Regards,
> Steven Lee
I would think that, however you are providing IP addresses, any ingress point 
to a GSM core network ought to be carefully policed on security grounds. 
Especially if you have IMS or SIP-based services or intend to deploy them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090409/db9c2678/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list