InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo)
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Thu Sep 11 17:58:44 CDT 2008
On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> In the internet world, mass depeering / de-transitting like we've
>>> see in this instance is akin to capital punishment. By vigilantes.
>>> The US Old West redux.
>> Connecting to my network is a PRIVILEGE, not a right. You lose a
>> criminal case, you lose rights (e.g. freedom to walk outside).
>> Disconnecting you from my network is not denying any of your rights.
>> There is no law or even custom stopping me from asking you to prove
>> you are worthy to connect to my network. You don't want to prove it,
>> that's your right, just as it is my right to not connect to you.
>> Mind if I ask why you think you have any right to connect to my
>> network if I do not want you to do so? For _any_ reason, including
>> not showing me "legit" customers, political affiliation, or even the
>> color of your hat?
> amidst all this high flyin' political theory discussion of rights,
> is an elephant in the room. as conditions to merger/purchase, there
> were legal restrictions placed on one or more significant operators
> regarding [de-]peering (i.e. your statement above is significantly
> incorrect). my altzheimer's device tells me that those restrictions
> 2008.12.31. expect change.
The fact there is a temporary exception to the rule for two providers
in the US who agreed to the exception for reasons other than peering /
transit does not mean the rule is invalid.
As for (some of?) the exceptions expiring at the end of this calendar
year, I'm not at all certain it will be a sea change. Contrary to
popular belief, the US is not the center of the Internet any more.
And even if it were, those providers - even the two combined - are not
the center of the US Internet. Besides, wouldn't that just prove the
rule anyway? :)
The 'Net has become much more egalitarian. I would think that you of
all people Randy would applaud the internationalization and flattening
of the Internet.
More information about the NANOG