an effect of ignoring BCP38
Jo Rhett
jrhett at netconsonance.com
Thu Sep 11 16:57:23 UTC 2008
On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> FWIW, based on off-list discussion, Jo's disagreement seems to stem
> from a misunderstanding of how loose uRPF works (he didn't know it
> accepts any packet that has a route in the routing table).
Um, no. Because if you put loose mode uRPF on your edges you aren't
implementing BCP38 now are you?
I don't care how it is deployed. That's your job ;-)
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
More information about the NANOG
mailing list