Cisco uRPF failures
christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Sat Sep 6 14:13:06 CDT 2008
On 9/6/08, Anton Kapela <tkapela at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jo Rhett <jrhett at netconsonance.com> wrote:
> > found a network operator using uRPF on Cisco gear.
> > (note: network operator. it's probably fine for several-hundred-meg
> > enterprise sites)
> Forgive me, but what does bits/sec have to do with anything?
it's possible that on some platforms the uRPF check happens on the
main processor, or on a linecard processor. So, bps rates (proxied for
by pps rates) matter greatly, on those platforms.
More information about the NANOG