Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Thu Sep 4 12:05:16 CDT 2008
On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Count you which way? You seem to agree with me. Everyone should be
> doing both, not discounting BCP38 because they aren't seeing an
> attack right now.
No one sees attacks that BCP38 would stop?
Wow, I thought things like the Kaminsky bug were big news. I guess
all that was for nothing?
(Yes, I am being sarcastic. Anyone who thinks attacks which BCP 38
would stop are not happening in the wild is .. I believe the phrase
used was "confused and misinformed".)
> On Sep 4, 2008, at 9:50 AM, John C. A. Bambenek wrote:
>> Count me in.
>> There is no reason to limit our defenses to the one thing that we
>> think is important at one instance in time... attackers change and
>> adapt and multimodal defense is simply good policy.
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Jo Rhett
>> <jrhett at netconsonance.com> wrote:
>>> On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, James Jun wrote:
>>>> Indeed... In today's internet, protecting your own box (cp-
>>>> plane filtering) is far more important IMO than implementing
>>>> BCP38 when
>>>> of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources anyway (see
>>> I'm sorry, but nonsense statements such as these burn the blood.
>>> Sure, yes,
>>> protecting yourself is so much more important than protecting
>>> anyone else.
>>> Anyone else want to stand up and join the "I am an asshole" club?
>>> Jo Rhett
>>> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open
>>> source and
>>> other randomness
> Jo Rhett
> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
> and other randomness
More information about the NANOG