alec.berry at restontech.com
Thu Sep 4 08:43:59 CDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> One small data-point -- on a personal vanity domain, approximately 2/3 of
> all the spam (circa 15k junk emails/month) was 'direct to inbound MX'
> transmissions. The vast majority of this is coming from end-user machines
> outside of North America.
This confirms the limited data I have. I configure my edge firewall (pf)
to drop anything to/from the Spamhaus DROP list, as well as sendmail to
use their XBL. The DROP list seems like it blocks mostly MX lookups
(nice to see the blocking of mail start so early in the process!), so it
is hard to say how many SMTP connections never happen (remote server/bot
does not know where to connect). The XBL list, which is mostly
residential IPs around the world, seems to be the single most effective
technique in blocking incoming traffic-- on port 25. Obviously, these
connections are coming from ISPs that do *not* block egress TCP 25.
Slightly off topic-- I found it quite easy to configure the DROP list to
work with pf (or is that the other way around?). I would be happy to
share the small Perl script that updates the pf table. When I configured
the DROP list on a free public wireless system I maintain, I was amazed
at how much egress traffic it blocked-- obviously rogue/bad/evil
webservers, IRC hosts, etc.
I wonder if anyone else is using it that way?
/ Alec Berry \______________________________
| Senior Partner and Director of Technology \
| PGP/GPG key 0xE8E9030F |
| http://alec.restontech.com/#PGP |
| RestonTech, Ltd. |
| http://www.restontech.com/ |
| Phone: (703) 234-2914 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG