Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
sethm at rollernet.us
Sun Nov 2 20:10:06 CST 2008
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> On 11/2/08, Daniel Roesen <dr at cluenet.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
>>> Problem resolved?
>> Best regards,
> Seeing as Cogent is going to try tooth and nail to keep their new found Tier
> 1 status (and not pay anyone for transit), I would think this would bode
> worse for Sprint, since most of their transit customers could migrate to
> Cogent (saving $$$ and not having to face future depeerings). Just my $0.02.
I guess, if you like being affected by Cogent's peering spats on a
recurring basis. Are you forgetting this is not the first time?
More information about the NANOG