On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <williamsjj at digitar.com> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing > intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days? This was planned, and then announced approx 5 days ago. You are subscribed to nanog-announce, right? ;-) -Jim P.