[NANOG] US DoD receives chunked IPv6 /13 (14x /22 but not totally consecutive)

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE cdl at asgaard.org
Sat May 17 04:31:31 CDT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You certainly don't have to.  However, as other folks have indicated  
here, that is the way that some folks read it.  My guess is that this  
was purely for network topology and administrative reasons.

	Chris

On 16 May 2008, at 12.51, Colin Alston wrote:

> On 16/05/2008 20:15 Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
>> 	My guess is that they don't want to be tied to only announcing a
>> single /13.  Each of those organizations is bigger than a lot of
>> service providers out there...
>
> Since when do you have to announce only the same size prefix as your
> allocation?
>
> -- 
> Colin Alston ~ http://www.karnaugh.za.net/
> "To the world you may be one person, to one person you may be the
> world" ~ Rachel Ann Nunes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG at nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>

- ---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB67593B




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJILqXzAAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw/UxkH/25h7CPcpr50ontu5y/sYFav
dXron7uvLtCEFPyT/mEemYn31hekjsd37xy6bLMeAaqwo6/Eh66nZxKLhKLgtR+q
f+PBAUj5znQ58/NITvJzIq3fFN3A1ll3x96cqOVSmiqa1DZo6ChquX1CW2sIRBWw
aVQaFatrVnvlGx7cDR6IFiwertrEftcK/7POm9wgljYUCfS9pZhv3hy66yNUdEe9
4MWIB6K9lK36WBHz+ZnKLRbmw3QALFAbTWwzVC9qc0EFY7Yr3b3BZuba0UGyin0d
HcL0cupzJ3UutINwVjUlmujbwaYot8pyVcr3FrQ9YbZ2mGLDvvMTVjipuWtqmOU=
=wh07
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the NANOG mailing list