.255 addresses still not usable after all these years?

• Previous message (by thread): .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
• Next message (by thread): [NANOG] Introducing latency for testing?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I don't get it.  As I mentioned about a year ago, when we last had this discussion, I have been handing out /23s to DHCP customers for years.  No problems.  .0 and .255 are not on WAN circuits or anything else, but zero problems for dynamically assigned customers.

scott

• Previous message (by thread): .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
• Next message (by thread): [NANOG] Introducing latency for testing?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]