Hardware capture platforms
Christopher Morrow
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jul 30 00:12:09 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Check out packet forensics depending on what your ultimate requirements are.
>
I would also add a 'see packet forensics'...
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, "John A. Kilpatrick" <john at hypergeek.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on
>> which to capture the data. Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but I've
>> got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports. Has anyone done any
>> research on doing accurate packet capture with commodity hardware?
>>
>>
>> --
>> John A. Kilpatrick
>> john at hypergeek.net Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/
>> john-page at hypergeek.net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504
>> remember: no obstacles/only challenges
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list