So why don't US citizens get this?
r.hyunseog at ieee.org
Mon Jul 28 10:08:36 CDT 2008
I think it is simply the matter of ROI - Return on Investment - issue.
I'm still living in the area without city water, and when there is power
outage, I don't have water at all since my water pump still needs
But some rural area has FTTH because of government funding RUS
And most of urban area, people are still happy with cable modem service.
People in Japan and South Korea are more of tendency to become
So when they have new products, they wants to try it by majority.
But in U.S., we are still cost oriented, and if we don't need it, we
don't buy it. ^^
That's my 2 cents.
Tom Vest wrote:
> Sort of makes one wonder how the US came to have ubiquitous roads, or
> power, or water distribution...
> On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> Lets put aside for a moment the conspiracy theories of government
>> intervention and
>> the telcos evil doing, IMHO there is a simple reason why I don't have
>> to my house: geography & economics.
>> - area = 377,873 Km^2
>> - density = 337/Km^2
>> - pop = 127.5 mill
>> - area = 9,826,630 Km^2
>> - density = 31/Km^2
>> - pop = 304.7 mill
>> I belive there are just few major cities in the US that have a
>> comparable or
>> concentration of people like other large cities around the world.
>> I'd bet that if you deploy fiber in a given radious in a suburban
>> area in
>> Japan you
>> may reach hundreds or thousands of potential customers, do the same a
>> north from where I live and you will reach a dozen guys, 50 cows and a
>> couple of
>> hundred chickens.
>> The US is so spread out that anything to do with transportation, being
>> packages, or ip packets becomes quite costly.
>> Still I beleve is interesting to analyze why the US is lagging behind on
>> high speed
>> My .02
More information about the NANOG