IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat Dec 27 14:37:51 CST 2008
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, devang patel wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out other good part of having CLNS as a transport
> for ISIS as a security point!
It's also a potential hassle, where you can have IS-IS up and running, but
have IP completely hosed. With OSPF this is harder as it actually runs
over IP; no IP, no IGP adjacancy.
There is good reason why neither OSPF nor IS-IS rules the IGP world, they
both have their advantages and disadvantages. Differences are usually in
what the organisation is used to, not because one is fundamentally better
than the other.
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG