hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
Thu Dec 4 09:01:54 CST 2008
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster at gmail.com> said:
>> I deliberated for a while on whether to send this, or not, but I figure it
>> might be of interest to this community:
> One thing doesn't make sense in that article: it talks about POTS being
> subsidized by other services, and people cutting POTS lines. Wouldn't
> that be _good_ for the companies and their other services? The way the
> article describes things, fewer POTS lines = smaller subsidies taken
> from other services = better profits for other services and the company.
the lines are still there and still require maintenance so they loose
money on it.
More information about the NANOG