Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Sat Aug 30 05:55:40 UTC 2008
* jim deleskie:
> Announcing a smaller bit of one of you block is fine, more then that
> most everyone I know does it or has done and is commonly accepted.
> Breaking up someone else' s block and making that announcement even if
> its to modify traffic between 2 peered networks is typically not
> looked as proper. Modify your taffic good. Do it to anyone other
> traffic = bad.
No, the idea would be to do this to your own prefixes/traffic.
+------/AS 2/-----/AS 3/--------+
| |
/AS 1/ /AS 4/
| |
+----------/AS 5/---------------+
I'm AS 1, and the link to AS 2 has a bad metric from my POV. AS 4 uses
local preference (or something else I can't override by prepending my
own AS) to route traffic to me through AS 3 and AS 2. Now I prepend
AS 4 to my announcement to AS 2, and voilà, the traffic flows through
AS 5, as desired.
No prefix hijacking has occurred (I would have received the traffic
anyway, just over a different path), it's just traffic engineering.
(But probably a variant that is generally frowned upon.)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list