Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

Paul Ferguson fergdawg at netzero.net
Thu Aug 28 06:10:33 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:

>At 11:32 PM 27-08-08 -0500, John Lee wrote:
>>Thanks guys, going back to my Comer one more time. My issue, question was
>> whether the organization doing the hijacking controlled all of the
>>routers  in the new modified path or only some of them?
>>
>>John (ISDN) Lee
>
>They didn't have control of any routers other than their own.  What they 
had to find is a single clueless upstream ISP that would allow them to 
announce prefixes that didn't belong to them.
>

*bing*

Trust is the major exploit here. That has never been "new".

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFItkFQq1pz9mNUZTMRAgqHAJ4ogryvjftxw5CQTWhf0c7VyBBXyQCfUo9w
qdK2kEWHY/B1AU/rGNikOlg=
=d/L7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/





More information about the NANOG mailing list