interger to I P address
Robert D. Scott
robert at ufl.edu
Wed Aug 27 13:55:37 UTC 2008
The harder way:
Decimal: 1089055123
Hex (dashes inserted at octals): 40-E9-A9-93
Decimal (of each octet): 64-233-169-147
IP Address: 64.233.169.147
Robert D. Scott Robert at ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Receptionist
University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX
Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
Gainesville, FL 32611 321-663-0421 Cell
-----Original Message-----
From: Matlock, Kenneth L [mailto:MatlockK at exempla.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: interger to I P address
Huh, learn something new every day!
Well, at least my method shows the underlying theory behind how the
conversion works :)
Thanks!
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
(303) 467-4671
matlockk at exempla.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch at muada.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:27 AM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: Colin Alston; kcc; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: interger to I P address
On 27 aug 2008, at 14:18, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Easiest way.
$ ping 1089055123
PING 1089055123 (64.233.169.147): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=105.418 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=105.891 ms
^C
--- 1089055123 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 105.418/105.655/105.891/0.236 ms
:-)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list