Level 3 TPA routing today?
Paul Wall
pauldotwall at gmail.com
Wed Aug 27 06:11:35 UTC 2008
Confirmed outage on their side. Should be resolved now.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Scott Berkman
<scott.berkman at reignmaker.net> wrote:
> We've also been seeing some "weird" (hard to track down) issues all day
> with Level 3 in both Tampa and Atlanta, especially from our NMS systems
> monitoring systems all over the place.
>
> My contact at Level 3 didn't know of anything going on and couldn't really
> find anything. Anyone else have a Level 3 response?
>
> -Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Beckman [mailto:beckman at angryox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:40 PM
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Level 3 TPA routing today?
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, david raistrick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, David Hubbard wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone seeing issues with Level 3 between anywhere
>>> and Tampa, particularly Atlanta and Dallas? We've
>>
>> Internap just reported problems with L3 out of Miami:
>>
>> "we are seeing latency, minor packet loss and path problems to a
>> number of destinations and other PNAPs via our Level3 (AS3356) upstream
>> connection in the MIA003 PNAP. "
>
> I've been seeing 30-70% packet loss between Cox Business and Level3 from
> DC to NY since 8:17pm EDT. Maybe via Internap?
>
> Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
> StDev
> 3. mrfddsrj01-ge706.rd.dc.cox.n 0.0% 100 2.4 5.1 2.2 51.9
> 8.3
> 4. xe-9-2-0.edge1.Washington1.L 67.0% 100 2.5 6.8 2.4 41.6
> 8.6
> 5. vlan99.csw4.Washington1.Leve 69.0% 100 2.7 8.3 2.6 23.7
> 5.0
> 6. ae-93-93.ebr3.Washington1.Le 68.0% 100 3.0 9.9 2.7 30.9
> 6.3
> 7. ae-3.ebr3.NewYork1.Level3.ne 70.0% 100 10.5 15.8 8.1 44.2
> 8.8
> 8. ae-83-83.csw3.NewYork1.Level 71.0% 100 18.9 14.2 8.1 42.0
> 7.1
> 9. ae-31-89.car1.NewYork1.Level 66.0% 100 8.6 25.7 8.5 165.4
> 41.7
>
> Beckman
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Peter Beckman Internet
> Guy
> beckman at angryox.com
> http://www.angryox.com/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list