It's Ars Tech's turn to bang the IPv4 exhaustion drum

Seth Mattinen sethm at rollernet.us
Tue Aug 19 12:37:42 CDT 2008


Michael Thomas wrote:
> Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't have a problem with assigning customers a /64 of v6
>>>> space.
>>>
>>> Why so little? Normally customers get a /48 except for residential
>>> customers who can be given a /56 if you want to keep track of
>>> different block sizes. If ARIN will give you a /48 for every
>>> customer, then why be miserly with addresses?
>>
>> I don't operate an ISP network (not anymore, anyway...).  My customers
>> are departments within my organization, so a /64 per department/VLAN
>> is more sane/reasonable for my environment.
> 
> Uh, the lower 64 bits of an IP6 address aren't used for routing you
> know? They're essentially the mac address, or some other sort of
> autoconf'd host identifier. Last I heard, the smallest allocation is
> supposed to be a /48 -- I hadn't heard of the /56 thing that Michael
> was speaking of, though I'm not surprised. There's 64 bits for
> routing... no need to be so stingy :)
> 

Last time I asked about this on the ipv6 list I got smacked for thinking
about using anything other than a /64 for subnets, even on point to
point links.

~Seth




More information about the NANOG mailing list