two questions - SWAG answers entertained

Mon Oct 8 16:49:00 UTC 2007

The nature of registry data leads to bugs like this, they should all be
RIPENCC.

jas

James Aldridge wrote:
>
> --On 8 October 2007 10:50:49 -0400 Jason Lewis
> <jlewis at packetnexus.com> wrote:
>>         RIB IP Coverage for
>> RIPENCC                                           312598027 13.9%
>>         RIB IP Coverage for
>> RIPE                                              197332093 8.8%
>
>
> Just out of interest, what's the difference between "RIPENCC" (the
> Regional Registry?) and "RIPE" (a vaguely defined group of people who
> contribute to the RIPE working group mailing lists and/or attend RIPE
> meetings and/or have some interest in IP networking in and around
> Europe and/or ... ?) here?
>
> James
>