IPv4 BGP Table Reduction Analysis - Prefixes Filter by RIRs Minimum Allocations Boundaries
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Fri Dec 21 21:10:25 UTC 2007
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Greenhalgh, John wrote:
> For example, we have a /19 allocated from APNIC and announce this from
> our Hong Kong network. Within that /19 we have assigned a /21 to our
> Australia site which is discontiguous from Hong Kong. This /21 is
> announced upstream to two ASes, and being in the 210/7 block would be
> filtered.
>
> We have several discontiguous networks around the world and when these
> sites started it could not be justified to use a min RIR allocation for
> the site.
That's unfortunate, but your problem doesn't scale. If every network got
an RIR allocation, and then subnetted it among several discontiguous POPs
and polluted the global route table with those subnets, the routing table
would be even worse than what we have today. How much are you willing to
pay every other network to carry your deaggregates? What makes your
deaggregates special and more worthy of a free ride than any other
deaggregating network?
With the holiday and new years fast approaching, and our upgrade kits not
quite fully assembled (much less tested), I just filtered you (before
seeing your message) as we're now filtering APNIC on "RIR Minimums". We
were just 2399 routes away from our Sup2s doing bad things. Now we're
20306 routes away...which leaves a much more comfortable margin of safety.
Looking forward to seeing your routes early next year...after we've
upgraded.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list