Spam filtering bcps [was Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism]
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Wed Apr 12 15:03:54 UTC 2006
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Matthew Black wrote:
>
> I haven't seen any succinct justification for providing a
> 550 message rejection for positively-identified spam versus
> silently dropping the message.
If you are wrong about the message being spam, then the sender gets a
bounce.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BERWICK ON TWEED TO WHITBY: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 5 OR 6, PERHAPS INCREASING 7
LATER IN NORTH. RAIN AT FIRST. MAINLY GOOD. SLIGHT OR MODERATE.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list